Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 08:57
Thank you.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Byron Allen Puts His Local TV Stations Up for Sale - The Hollywood Reporter
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Thousands of Norwegians mistakenly told they won millions in lottery - CBS News
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Thunder-Pacers: SGA, OKC rally to win Game 4 of NBA Finals - Al Jazeera
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
What’s next?
Whitesides says budget proposal shows the administration does not value NASA science - SpaceNews
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Russia can stop this any time.
What is the most overrated pleasure? Why?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.